@@ 4038,8 4038,15 @@ in this example:
@deffnx {Scheme Syntax} mlet* @var{monad} ((@var{var} @var{mval}) ...) @
@var{body} ...
Bind the variables @var{var} to the monadic values @var{mval} in
-@var{body}. The form (@var{var} -> @var{val}) binds @var{var} to the
-``normal'' value @var{val}, as per @code{let}.
+@var{body}, which is a sequence of expressions. As with the bind
+operator, this can be thought of as ``unpacking'' the raw, non-monadic
+value ``contained'' in @var{mval} and making @var{var} refer to that
+raw, non-monadic value within the scope of the @var{body}. The form
+(@var{var} -> @var{val}) binds @var{var} to the ``normal'' value
+@var{val}, as per @code{let}. The binding operations occur in sequence
+from left to right. The last expression of @var{body} must be a monadic
+expression, and its result will become the result of the @code{mlet} or
+@code{mlet*} when run in the @var{monad}.
@code{mlet*} is to @code{mlet} what @code{let*} is to @code{let}
(@pxref{Local Bindings,,, guile, GNU Guile Reference Manual}).
@@ 4047,7 4054,8 @@ Bind the variables @var{var} to the monadic values @var{mval} in
@deffn {Scheme System} mbegin @var{monad} @var{mexp} ...
Bind @var{mexp} and the following monadic expressions in sequence,
-returning the result of the last expression.
+returning the result of the last expression. Every expression in the
+sequence must be a monadic expression.
This is akin to @code{mlet}, except that the return values of the
monadic expressions are ignored. In that sense, it is analogous to
@@ 185,8 185,9 @@ form is (VAR -> VAL), bind VAR to the non-monadic value VAL in the same way as
(define-syntax mbegin
(syntax-rules (%current-monad)
- "Bind the given monadic expressions in sequence, returning the result of
-the last one."
+ "Bind MEXP and the following monadic expressions in sequence, returning
+the result of the last expression. Every expression in the sequence must be a
+monadic expression."
((_ %current-monad mexp)
mexp)
((_ %current-monad mexp rest ...)