~ruther/dwl

0090b6bed61c21aae2a30ff5f2556baa97be5069 — Devin J. Pohly 4 years ago 7b1b5c7
clarify intention of feature suggestions
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

M README.md
M README.md => README.md +3 -2
@@ 18,9 18,10 @@ dwl is not meant to provide every feature under the sun. Instead, like dwm, it s
- XWayland support as provided by wlroots
- Zero flickering - Wayland users naturally expect that "every frame is perfect"

Features yet to be implemented (possibly as patches) are:
Features under consideration (possibly as patches) are:

- Communication from the compositor to status bars.  One possibility is to create a dwl-status protocol that bars can implement to be notified of compositor information. You can already use Waybar or yambar, but without tag information
- Protocols made trivial by wlroots
- Communication from the compositor to status bars.  A straightforward possibility would be to use stdout or a provided file descriptor.
- Implement the input-inhibitor protocol to support screen lockers
- Implement the idle-inhibit protocol which lets applications such as mpv disable idle monitoring
- Layer shell popups (used by Waybar)

Do not follow this link